The Centrality of

Motivation in Brain and in Mind

 

Back to the Map    Previous    Next    About Us

 

 

Other Topics:

What is Motivation?

     The Centrality of Motivation

     Motivational States vs.

           Motivational Traits

     Motivation vs. Volition

     Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation

     Other Motivational Constructs

Nature of Human Motivation

     Basic Motivation Concepts

     Types of Needs

     Achievement Motivation

     Frustration and conflict

Early Theories of Motivation

     Hierarchy of Needs

     Theory of X and Y

Contemporary Theories of Motivation

     ERG Theory

     McClelland's Theory of Needs

     Cognitive Evaluation Theory

     Goal-Setting Theory

     Reinforcement Theory

     Equity Theory

     Expectancy Theory

Other Theories of Motivation

     Attribution Theory

     Expectancy-Value  Theory

     Flow Theory

     Two Factor Theory

     Job Design Theory

Motivational Tests

 

Motivation is not just one more set of psychological processes. If animals evolved with a motile strategy to go after the substances and conditions they need, the most basic requirement for their survival is successful goal striving. In that case, all animal evolution, right up to humans, must have centered on natural selection of whatever facilitated attaining goals. This must mean that everything about humans evolved in the service of successful goal striving—including human anatomy, physiology, cognition, and emotion. These other features of being human must therefore be understood in terms of their relationship to goal striving and the motivational systems that make it possible.

In recent decades, neuroscientists have turned up dramatic evidence of the close connections between virtually all psychological processes and those associated with emotion and goal-striving. Ledoux (e.g., 1995) showed that, in the brain sensory systems, pathways bifurcate—some leading from sense organs to the cerebral cortex, and others from sense organs to the limbic system, which is heavily implicated in emotion. This suggests that sensory signals begin to trigger emotional reactions at least as quickly as they trigger cognitive processes that analyze the signals in order to make more detailed sense of them. There are also pathways from the limbic system to the cortex and from the cortex to the limbic system, which provides a system for mutual alerting, refinement, and correction between emotional and cognitive responses to the signal. Neurons in the anterior cingulate, a part of the limbic system, fire according to expectancy of reward (Shidara & Richmond, 2002). Thus, brain anatomy indicates that emotional response and closely related motivational processes are a central part of responding to something.

The centrality of emotional and motivational processes is also apparent in the work of Antonio and Hanna Damasio and their colleagues. They have, for example, shown that destruction of specific brain areas, such as the medial prefrontal cortex, leaves people unable to stay on course toward their goals, substantially crippling their ability to lead normal, satisfying lives (Damasio, 1994). The ventromedial prefrontal cortex appears to integrate emotion-related signals from the limbic system with signals from various cortical areas, including some that are necessary for planning and volition.Without this integration, people become impulsive, make unrealistic plans, and are easily distracted from their goals. Along similar lines, a controlled experiment showed that, unlike normal individuals, patients with ventromedial prefrontal damage were unable to learn to avoid risky or nonoptimal strategies in a laboratory game (Bechara, Tranel,&Damasio, 2000; Bechara et al., 1997). In the first of these two studies, the brain-damaged participants, in contrast to others, manifested no skin conductance responses when they chose risky strategies. Here skin conductance responses presumably reflect fear of taking a risk that would be inappropriate relative to the individual’s goal in the task. Thus, the particular brain damage of these patients interfered with input from their emotional responses and correspondingly compromised their ability to make appropriate, goal-related decisions.

Mounting evidence such as this confirms the centrality of motivational and emotional processes in the organization of the brain. Correspondingly, it supports the parallel, older evidence of their centrality to psychological organization, and it underlines the importance for counselors and psychotherapists of understanding the interconnections with motivational processes and integrating applicable methods into treatment procedures.